Apple Inc. and Epic Games faced an antitrust battle in a high-stakes international trial. The trial revealed emails from Apple NDA’s that revealed insights into the company’s strict policy on data protection, customer privacy, and marketing strategies. While the jury ultimately ruled in favour of Epic Games on August 13th 2020, these emails provide invaluable technological and legal insights.
This guide takes a closer look at some of the most authoritative and eye-opening emails from the trial that showcase policy decisions made within the Apple corporation. Through analysis of transcripts from the court-room we can observe how organisations make decisions concerning customer privacy, competition policy, user experience design principles and more. Additionally, we provide expert analysis to help explain complex legal concepts throughout this guide.
By exploring these documents in depth, we will gain meaningful insights that further our understanding of how technology works behind the scenes to benefit customers worldwide – while still respecting individual consumer rights under US law.
The Dispute
The legal dispute between Apple and Epic Games has been highly publicised for months, with both sides claiming to be fighting for their respective rights. While the matter has yet to be decided, plenty of emails have been exchanged between the parties.
With that in mind, here are some of the best emails from the Apple vs. Epic trial that summarises the dispute and highlights the key issues between the two tech giants.
Apple’s Allegations
Apple has alleged that Epic Games had infiltrated the App Store guidelines. Apple said Epic sought special treatment and violated Apple’s rules by marketing a competing app store within its own Fortnite game, utilising a “hotfix” to roll out the changes without Apple’s permission or notification. Apple also alleges that Epic interfered with approved payment systems to financially enrich itself through lower fees.
In response, Epic countered that it had never asked for special deals or discounts and accused Apple of using its control over the iOS app marketplace to dictate the terms of developers’ agreements, dictating how apps must be run and how developers may receive consideration for their services. Additionally, Epic argued that companies who rely on the App Store have no choice but to accept whatever terms are dictated by Apple since no other alternative exists in the iOS environment.
Epic claims that this arrangement limits consumer choice and acts as an anti-competitive restraint on trade in violation of antitrust statutes. In addition, they allege that this practice has further inflamed pricing discrimination against consumers – making them pay more for software than they would otherwise be paying if more competitive options were available for accessing those programs like an alternate app store or payment processor. Ultimately, Epic seeks an injunction prohibiting Apple from retaliating against them or any other developer who attempts to innovate outside Apple’s strict parameters.
Epic’s Allegations
Epic Games’ allegations against Apple began in August 2020, when Epic attempted to circumvent the App Store’s payment systems and add its option for users to purchase virtual currency for its popular game Fortnite. After three weeks, Apple responded by suspending Fortnite from the App Store and beginning a legal battle with Epic.
Epic claims that Apple abuses its dominant control of the iOS marketplace by requiring app developers to use exclusive payment processing systems and prohibiting third-party app stores. The game developer also alleges that Apple takes an excessive 30 percent fee on all App Store transactions, maintains anti-competitive terms regarding searches and ads, and uses other unfair restrictions that it applies equally to all developers to protect its monopoly over the iOS market. Finally, Epic claims that Apple treats different categories of apps differently regarding fees and commissions, disadvantaged some while enriching others.
All the best emails from the Apple vs. Epic trial
The Apple vs. Epic trial has drawn much attention over the last few weeks. As the trial proceeds, interesting emails have emerged between the two companies, revealing both parties’ legal and financial positions.
In this section, we’ll look at some of the most revealing emails from this ongoing trial.
Apple’s Emails
The trial between Apple and Epic Games over the tech giant’s App Store policies has made public a vast selection of emails from top Apple executives. The emails offer insight into Apple’s inner workings and make for fascinating reading.
One email from Apple CEO Tim Cook to several executives declared that “we must hold firm” on their decision to deny Epic’s requested modifications to the App Store rules. The message conveyed a strong tone indicating that Apple was unwilling to bend its policy concerning threats of not complying with App Store rules by game developers.
Other notable emails include one from Eddy Cue, head of services at Apple, which clearly outlines the company’s stance concerning competing apps on the App Store platform. He wrote that it “makes sense to thin out duplicate apps (i.e., only allow 1 app per category per store) and reduce ‘gaming the system,’ as this is an ongoing problem we need to address going forward.” This suggests that having multiple apps of a similar nature confuses customers which could in turn hurt downloads, ratings and feedbacks— information which is critical for developers to properly market their products through the App Store platform.
Another email sent by Phil Schiller, senior vice president for worldwide marketing at Apple, acknowledged that approving competing platforms or ‘browsers’ — such as Google Chrome — could potentially hurt Safari’s market share and affect customer experience with WindowsOS and MacOS platforms since both rely heavily on Safari for them to function properly across their systems; therefore, Schiller viewed this as a major risk and was hesitant to approve them as they were classified under “alternative browsers” category within the developer guidelines of the App Store.
All these emails provide further insight into how decisions concerning Apps are deliberated internally within one of today’s biggest tech companies.
Epic’s Emails
Epic Games, the company behind the popular video game “Fortnite,” was prominent in the Apple vs. Epic court trial. The case centred on whether Apple unfairly monopolised the iPhone operating system and App Store. Numerous emails between personnel from both companies revealed many strategies throughout their negotiations that showed how competitive their business dealings can be. Here are some of Epic’s most telling emails from the trial.
On August 1, 2019, Tim Sweeney, then-CEO of Epic Games, sent an email to Apple regarding Apple’s announcement of a two-month Microsoft xCloud promotional period on iOS devices: “This announcement implies that it’s okay for App Store customers to access services like xCloud and Game Pass on iOS devices with web browser apps or other means without paying anything to Apple or purchasing an App Store product… [This] moves us ever closer to a world where all app stores will be compelled by law […] Allowing users access to services outside the app store should not be seen as any kind of concession but instead as bringing equilibrium to all platforms.”
In October 2020, Sweeney emailed Apple regarding Apple’s restrictions on Fortnite and other games: “We believe that your response [restricting Fortnite] places a greater burden on developers than is necessary for platform health and security […] If you accept our terms of service we provide a vehicle (even without IAP or other formats) that allows users and developers to safely transact directly……this proposal seeks not only fairness but also customer protections embedded in our codebase rather than trying to enforce them after-the-fact via feedbacks.”
The trial concluded with a ruling in mid-February 2021 in favour of Epic Games on several counts, though it didn’t grant any relief sought by the company. Despite this inconclusive ruling, emails in evidence demonstrated the strength with which both parties expressed themselves during negotiations — revealing their motivations and level playing field they felt each party deserved.
Analysis
Earlier this year, the Apple vs. The Epic trial concluded with the jury ruling in favour of Apple. Since then, the tech community has been abuzz with discussion. In particular, the emails exchanged between executives at the two companies have been a central point of discussion.
In this article, we’ll look at some of the best emails from the court proceedings and analyse what they tell us about the trial.
Apple’s Emails
Apple’s emails revealed during the Epic vs. Apple trial have shown a widespread effort by the tech giant to maintain its iron grip on the App Store. From rejecting requests from Epic Games to lower its App Store commission rate to encouraging developers to focus more on innovation than pricing, Apple’s emails demonstrate its clear intent that it alone will control access and development on the App Store.
Throughout the trial, Apple’s emails also showed its refusal to entertain any discussion of changing its policies and commission rates, even as internal discussions indicated there would be an antitrust risk if it continued with its “take it or leave it” stance regarding payments from developers. In addition, email threads from within the company showed repeated concern about potential impact of changes in app store fees on developers, leading some analysts to conclude that Apple indeed considers itself a monopolistic force in the mobile app market.
Through emails sent by former executive Phil Schiller, Apple also demonstrated that pricing controls were being placed on apps based primarily upon their popularity, rather than for a legitimate competition-related purpose as Apple had long claimed. In addition to rejecting requests from developers for better terms, documents revealed through testimony indicated that Apple was also punishing those who spoke out against their policies – including one instance where an indie developer was told his apps may be removed if he continued making critical statements regarding Apple’s practices.
Overall, while there are still many questions left unanswered by these emails and other related documents uncovered during this trial, it appears clear that when it comes to controlling access and monetization of apps offered in the App Store – Apple plans for no one else but itself to make major decisions about what should and should not be allowed inside its walled garden of commerce.
Epic’s Emails
In the Apple vs. Epic trial, Epic’s emails were admitted as evidence of its reaction to the App Store policies and their attempts to modify Apple. Epic’s emails revealed a strategy of using threats and intimidation while negotiating with Apple. Many of Epic’s emails showed they were not interested in a compromise and wanted complete control over their app store without any of Apple’s restrictions or rules.
The emails also suggested that Epic wanted to establish itself as an alternative to the App Store, hoping to charge lower fees for developers who chose its platform. Additionally, they implied that they would break away from Apple’s uniform rules on topics such as privacy, parental control settings, and transaction processing fees which they disagreed with.
Finally, the emails further indicate discussions between Epic and external parties such as Google and other tech companies about creating their store on iOS devices if negotiations with Apple failed.
